Introduction: What Amish Rumspringa Teaches Us About Leadership
Rumspringa is one of the most misunderstood traditions in religious life. Most people picture wild teenagers driving cars and breaking every rule before returning to a horse and buggy. The story is quieter, and far more useful for anyone who leads a team or runs a business.
The word comes from Pennsylvania German and means running around. Amish elders use it to describe the period between childhood and adulthood, typically starting around age sixteen. During this time, young people step outside the strict boundaries of the Ordnung, the unwritten rules that govern daily Amish life.
They attend singings, join youth groups, and many times experiment with the outside world before deciding whether to commit. The period has no fixed end date. It lasts until the individual feels ready to choose, sometimes for a few months, sometimes for several years.
The Myth Versus the Reality
Documentaries and books have turned Rumspringa into a spectacle. The truth is less dramatic. Most Amish teenagers do not leave home or radically change their behavior during this period. Many continue attending church and helping with family responsibilities. A minority tests boundaries more visibly, trying new clothes, vehicles, or technology. The exaggerated version sells more books than the ordinary one ever could.
The size of the community shapes how visible this exploration becomes. In large settlements like Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, or Holmes County, Ohio, there are enough Amish youth to form distinct subcultures, from the most conservative to the most rebellious. In smaller, more isolated communities, the testing period is far more restrained simply because there is no anonymity to hide behind.
What Rumspringa actually protects is something Anabaptist theology has held for centuries. Church membership cannot be inherited. It has to be chosen. Baptism only counts if the person freely accepts it as an adult. Rumspringa exists to make that choice real. Without the freedom to leave, staying would mean nothing.
Roughly eighty-five to ninety percent of Amish youth return and choose adult baptism. That number says something important about commitment. People who explore alternatives and come back are far more invested than people who never had a choice at all.
Why Forced Commitment Fails in Business
Leaders often skip this lesson. Onboarding programs, culture decks, and mission statements, try to instill commitment from day one. Commitment instilled without exploration rarely holds. Employees comply until something better appears. Teams follow a strategy until a louder voice in the room offers an alternative. Compliance is fragile. Choice is durable.
A version of Rumspringa happens inside healthy organizations, whether leaders name it or not. New hires test the culture before deciding if it fits. Teams pilot a new process before adopting it company-wide. Customers try a product before becoming loyal advocates. The businesses that grow strong cultures are usually the ones that tolerate this testing period instead of rushing past it. They let people see alternatives, then earn the commitment that follows.
Skip this stage and the cracks show up later. A new hire who never questioned the culture leaves the moment a recruiter calls with a better offer. A team that adopts a strategy because a senior leader demands it abandons that strategy the moment the leader changes the topic. Exploration is not the opposite of discipline. It is what makes discipline stick.
Running Around Through Ideas
This is where Rumspringa connects directly to how I think about applied knowledge. Syntopical reading works the same way. Instead of grabbing one book and treating it as gospel, you read several books on the same topic and let them argue with each other. You run around through different perspectives before settling on your own. The conclusion means more because you tested it against competing views first.
Intersection thinking pushes this further. You deliberately wander into unrelated fields, such as history, biology, design, and finance, looking for ideas that do not obviously belong together. The wandering looks unproductive from the outside. It is the same complaint Amish parents have about teenagers during Rumspringa. The wandering makes the eventual decision solid instead of borrowed.
Leaders who skip this exploratory phase copy whatever framework is trending that quarter. Leaders who build in deliberate exploration, through reading widely, testing ideas across domains, and questioning their own assumptions, end up with convictions that survive pressure. Running around is not a waste of time. It is where real ownership is built.
Building Exploration into Your Leadership
This is exactly what I work on with executives and founders inside the Applied Knowledge Is Power workshop. We treat exploration as a structured stage, not a detour. Participants read across multiple sources on the same problem, connect ideas from outside their own industry, and only then commit to a course of action. The commitment that follows is sturdier because it was earned rather than assumed.
The same principle applies to teams. A leader who insists on instant agreement is asking for compliance, not conviction. A leader who builds in a short, structured period of exploration, then asks for a decision, gets people who stay through hard quarters instead of the first sign of trouble.
Rumspringa is not really about teenagers and buggies. It is about a culture that understands something most organizations forget. The people who choose to stay, after seeing what else is out there, are the ones who stay.
Next Steps
Wondering what to do next, you can do all of:
If you want access to my Bookish Notes, please consider joining the wait list for my membership site, the Institute for Applied Knowledge.
This post contains affiliate links and The Invisible Mentor® may earn commissions for purchases made through links in this post. For more details, see here. Thank you so much for your support!
